TÉLÉCHARGER HAMOUD AL KHOUDER MP3 GRATUIT
| Nom: | hamoud al khouder mp3 |
| Format: | Fichier D'archive |
| Système d'exploitation: | Windows, Mac, Android, iOS |
| Licence: | Usage Personnel Seulement |
| Taille: | 66.39 MBytes |
And this was mentioned not only during the Obama administration but also it was mentioned by former scholars. The US has left it to India to publicly campaign against the CPEC, on the grounds that it will pass through parts of the former British Empire princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, which India claims is rightfully hers. Chief responsibility for this danger, however, lies with the United States. Wars are all extremely ugly. His report examines how the defects in the Flamanville EPR reactor pressure vessel came about during the manufacturing process, and escaped detection for years after forging. The defense ministry director general traveled extensively to France in those days and cultivated the entire political leadership in pursuit of the necessary agreements to build the Dimona plant.
No evidence was presented. Rants and threats do not require facts or proof; they hkouder require vehement emotional ejaculations and compliant mass propaganda organs. They only respond to armed force. Military and civilian officials have systematically destroyed entire economies, fostered ethno-religious wars, undermined ancient community and family ties and placed corrupt political puppets in power.
The result of these deliberate imperial policy decisions has been emptied cities and neighborhoods, broken families, destroyed lives and futures for many millions of young Arabs and Muslims.
The principal adversaries to US aggression, Russia, China and Iran, have not invaded any sovereign countries, nor have they provoked the desperate flight of millions of refugees.
Russia was invited to aid its Syrian government ally confronting an hamouc of terrorist mercenaries who are intent on dividing the country. Crimea peacefully re-joined Bamoud via elections. Moscow rejected playing any military role in support of Western wars against Iraq, Yemen and Libya. None of this rose to the level of US-EU barbarism.
China for its part has not engaged in any imperial war of conquest for centuries. Iran has not invaded any country in modern times. In khoouder, if waging wars, staging invasions, destroying whole societies and causing millions of deaths are the measure of barbarism, then the US, Europe and Japan have been clearly barbaric.
Humood alkhudher حمود الخضر
To claim otherwise and follow the ranting script of Ambassador Samantha Power is to enter into a tunnel of hallucinations where the language of liberal values embellishes truly barbarian acts. The entire language of politics has been perverted and converted into an artifice of self-delusion.
The deliberate spread of terrorism is itself a barbaric deed, which degrades the status of Western powers. In ancient Greece, the barbarians were those outside of the empire who did not speak the language of civilization. They were savage invaders seeking to pillage the wealth and culture of the empire. Khouuder imperial leaders have engaged in serial wars of destruction and pillage, even as their own societies and economies wallow in ignorance, misery, debt, addiction and criminality.
Imperial barbarians devastate whole cultures, erasing the great historical legacy hamiud ancient civilizations like Iraq and Syria, while imposing their culture of morons, drugs and electronic gadgets, which has already infantilized yamoud own population. The empire of barbarians is infested with moneychangers and corrupt speculators.
They have debased the entire legal system and legislative bodies. The public space has become a private latrine for the elite, closed to any real public discourse and debate. Electoral spectacles, khiuder than reasoned debates, undermine republican principles. Imperial conquerors, enmeshed in a military metaphysic, cannot reconstruct a devastated society into a productive colony, nor can they learn or benefit from the best and brightest among its captives, as Rome did with Greece, because it has sown such destruction and salted the very soil under the feet of its conquered peoples.
It rules by terror abroad and deceit at home. As so crudely displayed by the imperial rants of Ambassador Samantha Power, its oratory at international khoyder reflect the hysteria of mediocre functionaries: In the end, the imperial barbarians will be besieged by their own fleeing vassals and puppets. Haoud they finally confront their own decay and internal dissolution they have to decide whether to engage in a last global conflagration or dismantle the imperial barbaric order and choose justice, law and civilization.
Imperial Wars is Unmatched Americans: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness? Who are we Anyway? Do you really believe that people are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?
If so, you are totally irrational. And as for pursuing happiness? Whether you chase khoder until the end of your life, no khoudeg will ever care. Having a right to pursue it is irrelevant.
Attaining it is what matters, and no one has even ever suggested that people have that right. When Jefferson put those sentiments into the Declaration of Independence, he knew they were pure propaganda. Today it is myth.
The idea that people had unalienable rights was ludicrous. Is that idea ludicrous today? Some believe not, but believing something does not make it true. Even today, people, even Americans, are still taking the lives of others and enslaving them.
If life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness were ever rights, someone somewhere abolished them. He knew that the nation had been founded by people who owned slaves that had no role in its creation, who could not vote or hold elective office, and for whom no benefits were pursued.
He surely knew his pithy oration was pure propaganda.
One does not live for oneself or others, one lives and dies for God and country. Mankind evolved as migratory. Human beings have always moved to what they thought were greener pastures. Furthermore Americans have not always wanted them to in spite of the inscription on the Statue of Liberty.
In fact, Americans have never really wanted these poor, huddled masses. The dispute between Clinton and Trump supporters is based on ignorance. The Congress has always favored some peoples and rejected others. Massive migrations of people to the United States did not even begin until after The nation was then a century old. But between andmore than a million Eastern Europeans came to this country.
Most of these were Jews and Roman Catholics. They were followed by Italians. The numbers peaked by at over two million. Bythe conservative Congress had had enough. The National Origins Act was an exercise in discrimination on a world-wide scale. But the quotas were fudged. The mass migrations to the United States began in the s.
Bymore than 30 years of migration had taken place. Since the quotas were to be based on the number of people from various places already in America, getting those base numbers was essential.
()hamod lkhodr télécharger mp3 gratuitement musique en ligne | Télécharger MP3 Gratuit
But instead of basing those numbers on the latest census, that ofCongress decided instead to base them on the census of But that census contained higher numbers of Northern than Eastern and Southern Europeans.
Since each quota was to be a percentage of the people from each nation already in America, the quotas for Northern Europeans were proportionally greater than those for people from Eastern khuder Sour ten Europe. It also limited immigration from East and South Asian and Africa. Even if Ellis Island was a doorway to liberty for some, it was never a doorway for all.
HAMOUD EL KHODR MP3 GRATUIT
The arguments proffered for the act held ,p3 the earlier admitted hamokd were skilled, thrifty, and hardworking while those from Southern and Eastern Europe were unskilled, ignorant, not Protestant, and not easily assimilated. Also the Naturalization Act of provided that only white persons and persons of African descent or African nativity could become naturalized citizens, and Associate Justice of the Supreme Court George Sutherland ruled that only Caucasians were white, In fact, it was not until that national origin considerations were abolished.
America became a nation of immigrants by necessity, not by choice.
The New Colossus envisioned by Emma Lazarus in is also merely a myth. We shall never know. The salient thing about the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address, and the poem inscribed on the Statue of Liberty is that none of these documents has any legal status. The sentiments they contain have never been enacted into any law. Consequently no one, not an official, person, agency or institution has any responsibility to instantiate these lofty ideals.
Everyone can say that they believe them without having to do anything to bring them to realization. Simply stated, myths are unreal.
They might merely express ideals that are idols of the mind. Objects to be worshiped but not to be acted upon. The realization is that people are not defined by what they claim to believe; they are defined by what they do.
The bombings destroyed many villages and displaced hundreds of thousands of Lao civilians. Up to a third of the bombs dropped did not explode, leaving Laos contaminated with vast quantities of unexploded ordnance. Over 20, people have been killed or injured.
In just ten days of bombing Laos, the U. When the United States withdrew its army from Viet Nam, it said almost nothing about what it had done in Laos. Laotians are still being killed and maimed by those bombs and no American political or religious leader, to my knowledge, has ever uttered a single word of regret or sorrow.
The Laotians were not an enemy.
The United States was not at war with Laos. It was no danger to the United States. It was not even an economic competitor. Why would the Americans do such a thing to innocent people?
Hamouda al khodr - Hamouda al khodr -
What kind of people would do mo3 a thing to anyone? Well, a kind, considerate, compassionate, and benevolent one, of course. Kind, considerate, compassionate, and benevolent? What are they then?
Comments
Post a Comment